Legal Featured Article
February 14, 2013
Apple Challenges Ruling on iPhone Trademark in Brazil
By Rory Lidstone, TMCnet Contributing Writer
Apple (News - Alert) just can't seem to stay out of the court room, but this time it isn't battling Samsung, but rather a Brazilian electronics manufacturer, Gradiente Electronica SA. The maker of the iPhone (News - Alert) found itself in Brazil recently with a ruling that Gradiente actually owns the "iphone" brand name. Of course, Apple today challenged the ruling by Brazil's copyright regulator, Inpi.
Gradiente filed the request to use the iPhone brand way back in 2000, pre-empting the launch of Apple's iPhone by seven years, but only received approval to use the trademark in 2008. In order to retain its trademark rights, Gradiente must prove to Inpi within the next 60 days that it made use of the trademark between 2008 and this year, as brands within Brazil must be developed within five years of gaining approval.
Unfortunately for Apple, IGB Electronica SA, a company formed due to the restructuring of Gradiente, actually launched its "iphone" line of smartphones this past December. To add insult to injury, the iphone Neo One runs Android (News - Alert), version 2.3.4 Gingerbread. Other specs include dual-SIM capability, a 3.7-inch 32 x 480 display, a 700 MHz CPU, 2 GB of internal storage and a five megapixel camera.
According to an Inpi spokesperson, Apple can still take the case to court or negotiate an out-of-court settlement with Gradiente. Apple is, of course, no stranger to the latter course of action, having struck a deal with Swiss railway operator SBB back in October, allowing Apple to use the trademark station clock design that appears on iPhones and other iOS devices.
That said, the company also found itself in a similar situation to this iPhone trademark case in China last year, where a manufacturer called Proview sued Apple for $1.6 billion claiming ownership of the iPad trademark. After Proview failed to comply with court instructions, the case was thrown out.
Edited by Brooke Neuman
LATEST LEGAL NEWS
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Brower Piven Encourages Investors Who Have Losses In Excess Of $100,000 From Investment In Retrophin, Inc. To Contact Brower Piven Before The December 19, 2014 Lead Plaintiff Deadline In Class Action Lawsuit
BANKRATE SHAREHOLDER ALERT BY FORMER LOUISIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL: Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC Reminds Investors with Losses in Excess of $100,000 of Lead Plaintiff Deadline in Class Action Lawsuit Against Bankrate, Inc.
LUMBER LIQUIDATORS SHAREHOLDER ALERT BY FORMER LOUISIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL: Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC Reminds Investors with Losses in Excess of $100,000 of Lead Plaintiff Deadline in Class Action Lawsuit Against Lumber Liquidators Holdings, Inc.
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Brodsky & Smith, LLC Announces Investigation of Greater Sacramento Bancorp in Connection with the Sale of the Company