Legal Featured Article
August 29, 2011
Microsoft Sues Motorola over Patent Infringement by non-US Made Phones
By Peter Bernstein, Senior Editor
Excuse me if Hurricane Irene induced cabin fever has made me cranky. However, I did get a perverse chuckle over a PCWorld item that popped up while I was hunkered down August 28 that started with, “Microsoft has joined the technology litigation party and launched a suit to prevent the sale of Motorola mobile phones in the U.S.”
No offense, but it is hardly the case that they are just jumping into the patent war pool for the first time. Just for grins I put into Google (News - Alert) the following term, “Microsoft Sues Google.” Here are the top five on the first page:
There are plenty more. In fact, this is not even the first time Microsoft is suing Motorola and not even the first time it involved Android related issues. In other words, not only is Microsoft not a stranger to such actions, it seems to enjoy suing Motorola and Google who are soon to be one -- regulatory weather permitting.
What the good folks in Seattle are up to this time
I will be brief. Microsoft’s latest move is to ban a number of Motorola phones in the United States which Microsoft claims infringe upon seven patents. These include ways to synchronize calendars and contacts as well as notifying applications of changes to signal strength. Some of the handsets that are covered in the litigation include the Droid 2, Droid X, Cliq XT, Devour, Backflip, and Charm.
Microsoft feels the International Trade Commission will rule in its favor, enabling it to enforce similar actions outside of the U.S.
This is all getting way too complicated. Here is just a sample:
At this point, there is not a major mobile device manufacturer who is not engaged in a legal tussle. The same can probably said for any entity with display, OS, synchronization or a host of other capabilities —one of the reasons Kodak (News - Alert) is being eyed for its camera and visualization patents.
Who knew two months ago when I started with TMCnet.com that a legal degree would be almost as valuable as the 30+ years of industry experience I have accumulated. What a shame.
As I have stated on more than one occasion --though it’s certainly not an original thought -- billions of dollars diverted to divide up the spoils between multi-billion dollar companies is, in a word, a DISGRACE. It is time for the Congress of the U.S. to get on with the business of reconciling the two similar version of patent reform. And, more importantly, it is time for the business people to get back to the business of innovation and real competition. Enough already!
Want to learn more about the latest in communications and technology? Then be sure to attend ITEXPO West 2011, taking place Sept. 13-15, 2011, in Austin, Texas. ITEXPO (News - Alert) offers an educational program to help corporate decision makers select the right IP-based voice, video, fax and unified communications solutions to improve their operations. It's also where service providers learn how to profitably roll out the services their subscribers are clamoring for – and where resellers can learn about new growth opportunities. To register, click here.
Peter Bernstein is a technology industry veteran, having worked in multiple capacities with several of the industry's biggest brands, including Avaya, Alcatel-Lucent, Telcordia (News - Alert), HP, Siemens, Nortel, France Telecom, and others, and having served on the Advisory Boards of 15 technology startups. To read more of Peter's work, please visit his columnist page.
Edited by Rich Steeves
LATEST LEGAL NEWS
Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Files Class Action Suit against Certain Registered Public Stock Exchanges, Brokerage Firms and High Frequency Trading Firms
Government Partially Settles False Claims Act Cases Arising From Construction Fraud at US Marine Corp Bases Camp Lejeune and Camp Pendleton
WTAS Global Extiende su Alcance a los Paises Bajos y Rusia a traves de la Incorporacion del Grupo Taxperience
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Levi & Korsinsky, LLP Reminds Investors of Class Action Against Kansas City Southern and Its Board of Directors and a Lead Plaintiff Deadline of June 16, 2014